Please note that this article was written in collaboration with legal professionals, yet it should not be interpreted as any sort of personal counsel.

Although we would love to help you with your venture in every way possible, there are limitations since we do not have all the necessary information on your project.

For reliable and specialized advice from a qualified lawyer based in your jurisdiction, kindly consult an authorized attorney.

Are you curious about the legality of gathering data from the web in an automated way?

Well, you are here, and you are certainly not alone.

Web scraping, also known as “web harvesting” or “data extraction,” has grown more prevalent in recent years as businesses and organizations become more reliant on accurate and up-to-date information.

As such, business owners must understand the ethical considerations and potential liabilities when engaging in the massive extraction of digital content.

Is Web Scraping Legal?

It is one of the most common questions associated with this technique.

In short, the answer to this question is a “yes” web scraping as a tool for obtaining data is perfectly legal.

However, it can be an elaborate process because of the vast range of potential applications.

In this blog post, we’ll discuss why web scraping legal issues and ethical implications can be complicated, including use cases for both permissible crawling activities and prohibited data collection practices.

Furthermore, we’ll provide tips on how to remain compliant with current regulations surrounding this topic while best serving your organization’s interests.

In order to maximize the power of data, it’s essential to understand the full scope.

So let’s dive into the world of data.

What Is Data And How Is It Used

Data refers to discrete, objective facts or pieces of information, usually collected and analyzed to make decisions or understand patterns and trends.

It can be quantitative (numerical) or qualitative (descriptive), structured (organized in a specific format), or unstructured (lacking a specific format).

Data can come from various sources, such as surveys, sensors, or online transactions, and can be represented in various formats, including text, images, or numbers.

Who Benefits From Utilizing Data?

Many different individuals and organizations can use data to their advantage:

  • Businesses: Companies use data to analyze customer behavior, optimize operations, and make informed decisions. They can leverage data to improve products and services, predict customer needs, develop targeted marketing strategies, and analyze procurements.
  • Governments: Data helps governments make informed policy decisions, allocate resources effectively, and measure the success of various initiatives. Governments can also use data to detect fraud, monitor public health, and predict future trends.
  • Researchers and scientists: Researchers in various fields use data to test hypotheses, explore patterns, and develop new theories. Data analysis is essential in fields such as physics, biology, psychology, and social sciences.
  • Non-profit organizations: Non-profits use data to measure the impact of their programs, identify areas of need, and make data-driven decisions to improve their services.
  • Individuals: People use data in their everyday lives to make better decisions, such as choosing healthier food options, planning travel routes, or managing finances.

You either are or represent one of them, right?

That said, how do we obtain this information? Let’s try to answer this crucial question.

Where Data Comes From

Data comes from a variety of sources, depending on the context and the type of information needed.

Data sources can be categorized as internal or external based on their origin within or outside an organization or individual context.

Internal data: This category includes data that is generated, collected, or maintained within an organization or individual’s environment. Examples include:

  • Administrative records (employee information, financial transactions)
  • Transactional data (sales, purchases, customer interactions)
  • Scientific research conducted by the organization (experiments, observations, simulations)
  • Sensors and devices owned or controlled by the organization or individual (GPS devices, temperature sensors, wearables)

External data: This category includes data that is sourced from outside an organization or individual’s environment. Examples include:

  • Government’s open data (census data, economic indicators, health statistics)
  • Web data (websites, social media platforms, online forums)

Internal & External Sources, What Are The Differences?

Internal data usually provides more control and customization, as it is specific to the organization or individual’s operations and activities.

External data, on the other hand, offers a broader context and perspective, allowing for benchmarking, trend analysis, and identification of new opportunities or challenges.

In today’s world, analysis of internal data is a necessary first step for any organization attempting to optimize operations.

Nevertheless, this isn’t sufficient to overcome fierce competition.

To level the playing field, it is essential to leverage external data too.

There is no self-generated data, as all data is created by someone.

Therefore, it can be assumed that the creator holds ownership over their property.

That’s where legal and ethical concerns come from.

External Data Sources for the Common Good

Governments today recognize that data can be used to create a positive impact on society.

“Data for the common good” is a concept that refers to the idea of using data, data analysis, and data-driven technologies to address pressing challenges and enhance the well-being of communities.

Subsequently, they ventured into producing open data, which is a type of freely available, accessible information that can be used for various purposes without any restrictions.

The broad concept of open data and the practice of making government data publicly available is a relatively recent phenomenon that has gained momentum in the last decade.

The objective is to harness the potential of data to create positive social, economic, and environmental outcomes while ensuring ethical and responsible data practices.

While there is no single government that can be credited with starting the open data movement, several countries have been at the forefront of this movement.

Pioneers In The Government Open Data Movement

One of the earliest examples of a government that began publishing open data was the United States.

In 2009, the US government launched, an online portal that provides access to a vast array of government data sets, including data on health, energy, finance, and education.

The launch of was part of the Obama administration’s Open Government Initiative, which aimed to increase transparency, participation, and collaboration in government.

Other countries that have been pioneers in the open data movement include the United Kingdom, which launched in 2010, and Canada, which launched its open data portal in 2011.

Both countries have made significant strides in making government data available to the public, with data sets ranging from crime statistics to weather data.

By making data available to the public, governments hope to increase accountability, facilitate collaboration, and promote economic growth.

But imagine the impact if the open-data movement could be taken to the next level:

What if technologies were used to gather and analyze external data from sources that are not necessarily affiliated with governments?

That’s what web data extraction is.

Web Scraping: Definition and Function

Web scraping, otherwise known as data extraction or web harvesting, is a technique used to extract data from websites in an automated fashion.

Scrapers use automated programs to collect information from a website faster than what would be possible by manually entering the same URL into a browser.

It involves using software, automated bots, or scripts to gather information and is not limited by any means.

It allows for large amounts of data to be collected and organized in a short period of time – making it an efficient and effective tool for businesses and researchers alike.

The process typically starts with writing a program that ‘crawls’ through web pages, finding and extracting designated content, such as text or images.

The primary intent of web scraping is to provide users with a way to access data that can benefit them without damaging the source.

However, any kind of data on the web can be extracted.

Once the necessary data is collected, it can then be usefully analyzed to draw insights from it, helping users make decisions rooted in evidence-based results.

This technique has become increasingly popular over the last few years, particularly with the growth of web-based applications and services.

The reason is that value of data becomes more and more clear for everybody and not only for Governments and businesses.

While this method can be an invaluable tool for various business goals, it is crucial to adhere to both legal regulations and ethical principles in order to remain compliant.

The Basic Legal Framework

The legality of web scraping depends on the jurisdiction, specific laws, and individual cases.

Factors that can affect the legality of web scraping include:

Violation of terms of service (ToS): If a website’s ToS explicitly prohibits web scraping, it might be considered a breach of contract, leading to potential legal consequences.

Data protection and privacy laws: Web scraping may infringe on data protection and privacy regulations, such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) if it involves personal data.

Intellectual property rights: Unauthorized scraping of copyrighted or trademarked content can lead to legal issues related to intellectual property rights.

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) or similar laws. In some cases, web scraping can be considered malicious behavior and even considered an offense under the CFAA or similar laws.

It is important to consider all of these factors when determining the legality of web scraping, as the outcome of a court case may depend on them.

Web Scraping Legal Issues And How They Were Solved

Web scraping has been the subject of numerous legal disputes in the United States.

In this context, several court cases have been brought to resolve disputes around web scraping practices and their legality, including the use of bots to access websites without permission, the violation of website terms of service, and the unauthorized use of copyrighted and trademarked materials.

These legal disputes have helped shape the legal status of web scraping and clarify the scope of relevant laws and regulations.

Biggest Legal Disputes Involving Web Scraping

Some of the most notable web scraping disputes in the United States and their implications for the legal and ethical use of web scraping are:

Ticketmaster v. (2000) – In this case, the court ruled in favor of Ticketmaster, finding that had violated Ticketmaster’s copyrights and trademarks, as well as engaged in unfair competition.

This case established that web scraping could potentially constitute copyright and trademark infringement and that companies could use legal action to protect their intellectual property rights.

eBay v. Bidder’s Edge (1999-2000) – In this case, the court granted a preliminary injunction in favor of eBay, finding that Bidder’s Edge’s activities constituted trespass to chattels and violated eBay’s terms of service.

In this case, was established that website terms of service could be used to prohibit web scraping activities and that the use of bots without permission could potentially constitute a violation of trespass to chattels.

Southwest Airlines v. FareChase (2002) – the court granted a preliminary injunction in favor of Southwest, finding that FareChase’s activities constituted a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

So web scraping could potentially constitute a violation of federal laws related to computer fraud and copyright infringement.

Craigslist v. 3Taps (2012-2015) – Here, the court granted a preliminary injunction in favor of Craigslist, finding that 3Taps had engaged in unfair competition and violated Craigslist’s terms of service.

This case further established the enforceability of website terms of service and the potential for web scraping to be considered unfair competition.

While some courts have ruled in favor of companies seeking to protect their intellectual property rights or enforce website terms of service, others have ruled in favor of web scraping companies seeking to collect publicly available data for research and analysis purposes.

Most Recent Precedents and Legal Transformation

The most recent and noteworthy legal ruling concerning web scraping was the 2019 case involving hiQ Labs.

This San Francisco startup had created a program to scrape LinkedIn profiles and collect publicly available data.

HiQ Labs v. LinkedIn is a legal case that was decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2019.

The case involved the use of web scraping by HiQ Labs, a data analytics company, to collect publicly available data from LinkedIn profiles.

LinkedIn, a social networking site for professionals, filed a lawsuit against HiQ Labs in 2017, alleging that HiQ’s data scraping activities violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

LinkedIn argued that HiQ’s scraping activities violated its terms of service, which prohibit users from accessing or using its website in any way that violates the law or the rights of others.

LinkedIn claimed that by scraping its website, HiQ was accessing LinkedIn’s computers without authorization and that this constituted a violation of the CFAA.

HiQ countered that its activities were legal under the doctrine of fair use and that LinkedIn’s attempt to block its access to publicly available information would violate the First Amendment.

HiQ also argued that LinkedIn’s terms of service did not explicitly prohibit scraping and that the CFAA only applies to activities that involve hacking or circumventing security measures, which did not apply to HiQ’s activities.

The case was closely watched by the tech industry, as the outcome could have significant implications for the legality of web scraping and the use of data obtained through web scraping.

In 2017, a district court judge granted LinkedIn’s request for a preliminary injunction, ordering HiQ to stop scraping data from LinkedIn profiles.

However, in 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the lower court’s decision, ruling that HiQ’s scraping activities did not violate the CFAA or the DMCA.

What Was The Verdict Of The Most Recent Court Ruling?

The court held that web scraping is not hacking and that companies cannot use terms of service to block access to the publicly available information.

The court also found that HiQ’s use of the data was protected under the doctrine of fair use.

The court’s decision was widely seen as a victory for data analytics companies and researchers who rely on web scraping to collect publicly available data for research and analysis purposes.

The decision also raised questions about the enforceability of website terms of service and the scope of the CFAA and the DMCA.

This decision showcases that using publicly available and not copyrighted data cannot cause legal issues in web scraping.

However, the decision does not grant web crawlers the possibility to use data gathered by scraping for any purpose or the freedom of obtaining data from sites that require authentication.

The Evolution of Web Scraping Laws

So, the legality of web scraping has undergone significant transformation over time, as new legal cases and regulatory frameworks have emerged to address the practice.

In the early days of the internet, web scraping was largely unregulated, and there were few legal protections in place for website owners seeking to prevent data scraping.

However, as web scraping became more common and sophisticated, website owners began to take legal action to protect their intellectual property and enforce their terms of service.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, several high-profile legal cases were brought against web scraping companies.

These cases established the potential for web scraping to constitute copyright and trademark infringement, as well as violations of website terms of service.

They also helped establish the importance of explicit terms of service prohibiting web scraping activities, and the potential for web scraping to constitute trespass to chattels.

In the early 2000s, federal laws were also introduced to address web scraping and related activities.

These included the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which established legal protections against unauthorized access to computer systems and the circumvention of digital copyright protections.

These laws have been used in several high-profile cases to prosecute web scrapers and related actors for violations of federal law.

More recently, there have been several legal cases that have clarified the legality of web scraping, particularly with regard to the collection of publicly available data.

These cases have established the potential for web scraping of publicly available data to be protected under the First Amendment and have limited the scope of the CFAA and DMCA in regulating web scraping activities.

Overall, the legality of web scraping has evolved over time as a result of legal disputes, regulatory frameworks, and technological developments.

The web scraping landscape has become more nuanced over time.

Established legal precedents have helped clarify the rights and responsibilities of web scrapers, website owners, and regulators.

Legal Implications of Data Extraction Right Now

Web scraping is the act of gathering data from websites.

Whether it’s legal or not depends on a few things, like the website being scraped, the data being collected, and why you’re doing it.

As long as you follow the rules and don’t break any laws or the terms of service of the website, web scraping is a great technique for businesses in digital era.

However, it can be illegal if it involves things like hacking, breaking website security measures, or stealing copyrighted content.

It can also be unethical if it collects personal information like logins or financial details.

But web scraping can be legal and ethical if it’s gathering public data like prices, products, or services.

Think of it like driving a car – there are rules to follow to stay safe, but we don’t stop driving.
We just make sure to do it safely.

Overall, the legality of web scraping can be complex and may depend on various factors.

It is important to conduct web scraping activities responsibly and ethically and to ensure that they comply with all applicable laws and regulations.

Web Scraping Ethical Implications

Although we have highlighted the legality of this practice, its ethical implications must not be overlooked.

The distinction between legality and ethicality in the context of web scraping.

It refers to the difference between what is permitted by law and what is considered morally right or acceptable.

While legality pertains to compliance with the rules and regulations established by the legal system, ethicality addresses the broader implications of the actions, including fairness, respect, and potential harm.

Ethical implications of web scraping refer to the moral considerations and potential consequences of the practice beyond its legal aspects.

Web scraping raises several ethical concerns, which can vary depending on the context, the data being scraped, and the purpose of the scraping.

Some Key Ethical Implications To Consider

  • Privacy and personal data: Web scraping can lead to the collection and distribution of personal data without individuals’ consent or knowledge, violating their privacy rights.

This can result in unwanted exposure, identity theft, or other potential harms.

  • Fair use and intellectual property: Web scraping may involve the extraction of copyrighted or proprietary content.

While some uses of this data might be considered fair, such as for academic research, others might infringe on the rights of content creators or website owners.

  • Unintended consequences: Web scraping can lead to unintended consequences for website owners, such as increased server loads or bandwidth costs due to automated requests.

This could negatively impact the performance of the website and affect the user experience for legitimate visitors. It is essential to consider the potential harm caused by excessive or aggressive web scraping.

  • Misuse of data: Data obtained through web scraping might be used for malicious or unethical purposes, such as disinformation campaigns, targeted advertising, or other manipulative practices.

Ensuring that the data collected is used responsibly and ethically is an important consideration.

Programs collecting web data ethically are called “good bots”.  The good bot acts as a good citizen of the web and does not seek to overburden the targeted website;

Good Bots vs. Bad Bots

The terms “good bots” and “bad bots” are commonly used in the tech industry to describe the two different types of automated computer programs that interact with websites and web applications.

The terms are widely used in discussions related to web development, cybersecurity, and online marketing.

“Good bots” are the Robin Hoods of the web, indexing content and measuring engagement on social media platforms.

These bots help businesses gather valuable market research data, which can lead to better products and services for consumers.

In fact, some companies even commission procurement data scraping software to monitor market activities.

However, the dark side of web scraping comes from the “bad bots”.

These nefarious programs mine information without permission and use it for purposes beyond the control of the data owner.

They’re like that annoying person who always cuts in line and takes more than their fair share.

It’s estimated that at least 10% of all web crawling bots are “bad bots”.

While “good bots” can be beneficial for businesses and consumers alike, “bad bots” are a scourge that can lead to privacy violations and unethical behavior.

It’s up to all of us to ensure that web scraping is done in an ethical manner.

But how can we make sure?

Let’s dive into more details.

Potential Harmful Effects of Bad Bots

Harmful bots can cause significant damage by engaging in activities like stealing data, spamming, and hacking into accounts.

Despite their negative effects, some new businesses use them due to their low cost and effectiveness for data collection.

Larger companies may also employ bots for their own gain, but they frown upon others using bots against them.

One of the main concerns with harmful bots is their ability to cause denial-of-service attacks (DoS).

This is where a bot floods a website with traffic, causing it to crash or become inaccessible to users.

To prevent DoS attacks, many websites use tools like firewalls and content delivery networks (CDNs).

However, these measures are not foolproof and may not be able to protect against sophisticated bots.

As such, it’s essential to be vigilant and take appropriate measures to safeguard against bot attacks.

It’s crucial to be cautious when collecting data and consider the source of information.

While bots can be used to quickly obtain information about potential customers, this approach could infringe upon their privacy.

Large-scale spam email campaigns demonstrate the potential dangers of misusing scraped data.

To prevent ethical issues, it’s crucial to find a balance between the advantages of using bots and the potential risks they pose.

Analyzing past events can provide valuable insights into how to handle this problem effectively.

Regulations Surrounding bad bots

The Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act was passed by Congress in 2016 to prevent unethical scraping.

This was the first law created to specifically target bad bots.

The act prohibits the use of software that bypasses security controls on ticket provider websites.

Automated ticket scalping bots use various methods, such as web scraping, to detect opportunities for scalping, input shopping cart purchase information, and resell stock on secondary markets.

It’s not just up to ticket providers to protect against unethical behavior, as it applies to any software platform, company, or venue that sells tickets.

Great Britain followed the USA and introduced the Digital Economy Act in 2017.

The act aims to protect customers in various ways, including by making it a criminal offense for those who misuse bot technology to sweep up tickets and sell them on the secondary market at inflated prices.

These laws demonstrate the importance of protecting against the unethical use of bots.

As technology continues to evolve, it’s essential to stay informed and vigilant against potential threats.

By taking proactive measures to safeguard against bot attacks and adhering to ethical guidelines, businesses can protect their customers and maintain a positive reputation.

Current Regulations and Protection Issues

Information protection is becoming an increasingly critical issue for businesses due to the growing amount of data available online.

Data breaches and cyberattacks can have severe consequences for both companies and their customers, ranging from financial losses to reputational damage.

As such, companies need to be proactive in safeguarding their data and protecting against unauthorized access or use.

Companies today are less likely to take legal action against web crawlers, but they may still use various techniques to limit web crawling for information protection purposes.

What Are The Most Common Information Protection Techniques?

For example, rate-throttling is a technique used to control the rate of requests sent or received by a network interface controller.

This can help prevent denial-of-service attacks and limit web scraping.

Similarly, CAPTCHA is used to distinguish between human and web crawler access to a site.

These techniques are typically used to prevent bad bots from overloading and crashing a site, but they may also make automated scraping less cost-effective for web crawling companies.

Web scraping presents ethical concerns regarding privacy and data usage.

Scraping personal information without consent can be illegal and unethical.

Website owners have the right to control access to their data and can take legal action against web scrapers who violate their terms and conditions or engage in illegal scraping practices.

Therefore, it’s crucial to understand and adhere to legal and ethical guidelines when using web scraping for data collection purposes.

To ensure ethical scraping, it’s essential to understand that website owners may not want bots or crawlers to visit certain pages.

For instance, a website may have sensitive data that shouldn’t be accessed by bots.

All search engines continuously crawl the web, but website owners take various measures to prevent other parties from indexing or listing sensitive information on their sites.

Such measures include using a robots.txt file to specify which parts of the site should be crawled or not.

Data Privacy and Protection

Governments worldwide have been drafting legislation to protect individuals’ privacy, with the most notable being the EU’s GDPR and California’s CCPA.

However, these laws primarily protect individuals, not businesses.

When it comes to scraping business information, such as names, numbers, or addresses, privacy laws don’t have much to say since this information is generally considered public data.

While there is a significant amount of publicly available business information on the internet, some of the most extensive datasets require creating an account or paying for a subscription.

When signing up for such services, you must agree to terms and conditions that often limit automated data collection activities and control how you use them.

If you’re scraping data from a service that requires an account, it’s highly likely that you will be breaking the terms of service.

Moreover, your account information allows the service provider to collect additional data about you, such as your login details and usage patterns.

This information makes it easier for the service provider to detect and prevent web scraping on their platform and potentially ban your account.

Therefore, it’s crucial to be aware of the terms and conditions of the service you’re using and avoid violating them.

In summary, while privacy laws primarily protect individuals, businesses should still be mindful of ethical data collection practices.

When collecting business information, it’s essential to understand the terms and conditions of the data source and avoid violating them to prevent potential legal or ethical issues.

The Legal & Ethical Implications of Web Scraping in a Nutshell.

In conclusion, the legality and ethical aspects of web scraping are not black and white but depend on a variety of factors.

While web scraping can be a powerful tool for gathering data and extracting valuable insights, it is essential to consider the following factors before engaging in web scraping activities:

  • Jurisdiction: The laws and regulations governing web scraping vary from one country to another. Make sure you understand the legal framework in the specific jurisdiction where you plan to perform web scraping.
  • Purpose of scraping: If you are scraping data for a legitimate purpose, such as research or analysis, and do not engage in malicious activities, the chances of facing legal issues are generally lower.
  • Website terms of service: Always review and respect the target website’s terms of service, as some sites explicitly prohibit automated data collection.
  • Data sensitivity: Be cautious when scraping sensitive data, such as personal information. Adhere to data protection laws and ethical guidelines to avoid potential legal and moral issues.
  • Rate limiting and request frequency: Excessive requests to a website may cause harm by overloading the server or affecting the site’s performance. Implement rate limiting and reasonable intervals between requests to minimize the impact on the target site.

By taking these factors into account, web scraping can be conducted more responsibly, minimizing the risk of legal and ethical issues.

Always prioritize transparency, respect for website owners’ rights, and compliance with relevant laws and regulations.


Web scraping is a powerful tool that allows corporations to use the information on the internet, but it should be done the right way.

Legality is one aspect of the process, but it is equally important to focus on the ethics behind it.

To ensure legal and ethical web scraping, it is crucial to be considerate of other individual’s sites and resources.

Respect their rules and wishes, read over their Terms of Service, and consider contacting the webmaster if you suspect a site prevents you from crawling.

Ask permission to crawl their site and be considerate of their resources by using a slower crawl rate.

It’s important to note that web scraping should only be done with the respect to any individual whose data is collected.

Do not publish any content that was not intended to be published.

By following these guidelines, web scraping can provide a compelling potential to generate business intelligence without infringing on anyone’s rights or violating any laws.

However, if there are any doubts or concerns about the legality of the specific web scraping campaign, seeking the advice of a lawyer is recommended.